\
edef
does not work with \
protect
Robust LaTeX commands are either "naturally robust" - meaning that
they never need \
protect
, or "self-protected" - meaning that
they have \
protect
built in to their definition in some
way. Self-protected commands are robust only in a context where the
\
protect
mechanism is properly handled. The body of an
\
edef
definition doesn't handle \
protect
properly, since
\
edef
is a TeX primitive rather than a LaTeX command.
This problem is resolved by a LaTeX internal command
\
protected@edef
, which does the job of \
edef
while keeping the
\
protect
mechanism working. There's a corresponding
\
protected@xdef
which does the job of \
xdef
.
Of course, these commands need to be tended carefully, since they're internal: see '@' in control sequence names.
This question on the Web: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=edef