In the general case (possibly sticking something in the middle of an existing command) this is difficult. However, the common requirement, to add some code at the beginning or the end of an existing command, is conceptually quite easy. Suppose we want to define a version of a command that does some small extension of its original definition: we would naturally write:
\renewcommand{\splat}{\mumble\splat}
However, this would not work: a call to \splat would execute
\mumble, and the call the redefined \splat again; this is an
infinite recursive loop, that will quickly exhaust TeX's memory.
Fortunately, the TeX primitive \let command comes to our
rescue; it allows us to take a "snapshot" of the current state of a
command, which we can then use in the redefinition of the command.
So:
\let\OldSmooth\smooth
\renewcommand{\smooth}{\mumble\OldSmooth}
effects the required patch, safely. Adding things at the end of a
command works similarly. If \smooth takes arguments, one must
pass them on:
\renewcommand{\smooth}[2]{\mumble\OldSmooth{#1}{#2}}
The general case may be achieved in two ways. First, one can use the
LaTeX command \CheckCommand; this compares an existing command
with the definition you give it, and issues a warning if two don't
match. Use is therefore:
This technique is obviously somewhat laborious, but if the original command comes from a source that's liable to change under the control of someone else, it does at least warn you that your patch is in danger of going wrong.\CheckCommand{\complex}{<original definition>}
\renewcommand{\complex}{<new definition>}
Otherwise, LaTeX users may use one of the patch or patchcmd systems.
Patch gives you an ingenious (and difficult to understand) mechanism, and comes as an old-style LaTeX documented macro file. Sadly the old-style doc macros are no longer available, but the file (patch.doc) may be input directly, and the documentation may be read (un-typeset). Roughly speaking, one gives the command a set of instructions analagous to sed substitutions, and it regenerates the command thus amended. The author of this FAQ has (slightly reluctantly) given up using patch...
The patchcmd package addresses a slightly simpler task, by
restricting the set of commands that you may patch; you mayn't patch
any command that has an optional argument, though it does deal with
the case of commands defined with \DeclareRobustCommand. The
package defines a \patchcommand command, that takes three
arguments: the command to patch, stuff to stick at the front of its
definition, and stuff to stick on the end of its definition. So, if
\b contains "b", then
\patchcommand\b{a}{c}
will produce a new version of \b that contains "abc".
This question on the Web: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=patch